|
The history of the Boroks is one
of the oldest ones in the world. About 8000 -
12000 years ago (i.e. the period between 10,000
B.C and 6,000 B.C) in the middle of the
stone-age, Caucasians and Mongolians entered
this country through the western border and the
north-eastern border of India respectively.1 In
the last division of this age, pottery and
agriculture were introduced in human society.
The main community of these Mongolians was Bodo
or Boro speaking community who belong to the
Tibeto-Burman family of the Indo-China group. As
far as our knowledge goes, in the remote past,
for quite a sometime, a large province spreading
over the entire North-east India, Nepal, Bhutan
and Burma was known as Kirata land. Dr. A.H.
Dani considers that these Bodo (Boro) speaking
people were known as Kiratas and Slash in the
great epic of the Mahabharata.2 According
to Dr. Suniti Kumar Chatterji these Bodo (Boro)
speaking people of Mongolian race who spread
over the entire Assam valley and some parts of
North Bengal and East Bengal, was a large part
of the present population of the North-East
region. In due course of time a branch of these
Boro speaking people gradually proceeding and
moving aside from Noagaon of Assam to southward,
dominated first Kwchar (Kachar) and then some
parts of Sylhet (now in Bangladesh). In the
subsequent period of time, this group of Bodo
people moving aside further towards south,
established a Manikya dynasty by dominating Hill
Tipperah and its nearby provinces.3
Later on the exiled king from
Noagaon district of Assam founded the capital of
the kingdom at Kolongma of Borok valley of the
south. According to Sri Manojit Das, a resident
of Karimganj of Assam, an etymologist and a
follower of Sukumar Sen, Tipras who came from
the river Kolong and river Kapil, first
recognized and named the Borok river as
Kholongma or Big Kolong.4 Because
of distortion of pronunciation it took its shape
as 'Khalongma'. In Kokborok language the word 'Borok'
means human being. This is why from river 'Borok'
a place of human settlement, in due course of
time, has been named Borak. Sri Manojit Das
believes that when Tipra dynasty established its
kingdom and dominated over the Borak river
valley the non-plain land used to have submerged
under water almost throughout the year and just
to mean the 'great king of water land' they
started using the word 'Tiphra'. In Kokborok
water-related words such as ti, twi and tui were
found to have been used by the Tipras and the
Burmese word 'phra' means lord. Later the word 'Tiphra'
came to be pronounced as 'Tipra' or 'Twipra'.
From that time, they probably named this land of
their domination as Twipra-ha or Twipra. Here
Sri Manojit Das conjectures that the word 'ha'
is a Tibeto-Burman word meaning land. In this
way, the word 'Twipra-ha' after sanskritisation
assumed the name 'Twipra'. He has further
written that in the subsequent period of time,
the Tipra kings established the second capital
of Tipra kingdom at Bhanga of Karimganj district
of Assam, more southward from Khalongma of
Kwchar (Kachhar) of Assam. Till today, a big
pond and debris of bricks spreading over the
area about 20 sq. miles are found to be seen as
a living historic legacy of Twipra kingdom in
this region.
A mention has been
made about king Yash and his son Bonga in the
Chronicle of Twipra Kingdom edited by Kali
Prasanna Sengupta. According to Sri Manojit Das,
the capital, which has been named after king
Bonga, is Bonga-ha or 'Bhanga' of the recent
times. The Austric water-related word 'Bong' and
the Tibeto-Burmese word 'ha' being used to mean
land, conjointly gave a birth to a word
'Bong-ha' which means water land. And the
land-related word 'Bonga' has been evolved out
from the word 'Bonga-ha'. Perhaps, the Twipra
prince as a lord of water land has been named as
king Bonga. He also said that almost throughout
the year the big valley region of Karimganj of
Assam used to remain under water.
The history of Tripura, so far as it is written,
begins with the settlement of Yayati's exiled
son Druhyu of the famous Lunar Dynasty of the
Mahabharata.5 But
it is not free from criticism. Because, it has
been observed that some historians and writers
of the country always try to write Twipra
history in such a manner that history of the
Boroks or Tippras has a close link with the
'Indian history'. Because, if at all Druhyu were
a Borok or Tippra king, then Druhyu would have
been a Kokborok word. But, in fact, Druhyu was
or is not a Kokborok word and therefore it has
no meaning in Kokborok. So, it is assumed that
Druhyu is a distorted or altered name and it is
a sanskritised word. However, Druhyu is the
first mythological ruler of the Boroks of
Tippra, so the name of their first king must
have been a Kokborok name, for that matter all
the Non-Kokborok names of Borok kings might have
been sanskritised by the Indo-Aryan minded
writers in the past.
It may be mentioned here that the
meaning of the word 'Twipra' in Kokborok (mother
tongue of the Boroks) as mentioned in J. E.
Webster's North-Eastern Bengal District
Gazetteers, (1910), is 'the country towards
sea'. The hill people of Twipra (Tippra)
themselves pronounced it Twipra (Tippra).
Tavernier, a French Scholar, who visited Dakka
in 1640 A.D. also mentioned the name Twipra
(Tippra) in his book Tavernier's Travels in
India. The term 'Twipra' is originally derived
from the two Kokborok words, 'Twi' meaning water
and 'Pra' meaning adjoining land, junction or
area. Thus, the word 'Twipra' literally means
the tributaries of rivers or the land adjoining
to water areas. But the word 'Tripura' is a
sanskritised form of the original name Twipra.
It is very essential to note this fact that the
word 'Tripura' unlike 'Twipra' has comparatively
less affinity with Boroks (Tippras). On the
other hand, the term 'Twipra' has not only
linguistic ties with its aboriginal people,
Boroks (Tippras), but also has its own
original and historical significance and
meaning.*
Before
1920, Twipra Princely State was known as "Hill
Tipperah'. This territory was distinguished from
the neighbouring plain 'Tipperah', which
constituted one of the districts of British
India in the lower plains of East Bengal (now
Bangladesh). It was only in 1920 (i.e. during
the reign of King Birendra Kishore Manikya
Bahadur Debbarma, the father of the last Twipra
king Bir Bikram Kishore Manikya Bahadur
Debbarma) when, on the presentation of the
'Durbar' (Royal Court), the Government of
British India agreed that the Princely State
should be known as Tripura instead of 'Hill
Tipperah'. This was
stated in the Memorandum on the Indian States,
1932-33, brought out from Calcutta.
The terrible
stories of the Indian freedom movements,
India-Pakistan partition, great relocations of
people of this Sub-continent, the rise of
democracy, socio-political movements and the
unnatural demise of King Bir Bikram Manikya
caused the fall of monarchy in Tripura.
Although
the Tippra kings took some necessary steps for
education of their subjects but these were not
adequate. In fact, Tripura witnessed an
education movement organized by the Tripura
Janasiksha Samity from 1945-1948. It was started
by some educated tribal youths particularly the
Borok youths. With the initiative of the
Janashiksha Samity and with the co-operation of
people, 488 schools were established in
different villages, especially in hilly areas.
In 1945 there was a small unit of the Communist
Party at Agartala functioning under the Distrcit
Committee of Commilla. Biren Datta was its
organizer and leader. It is learned that Biren
Datta used to maintain a regular touch with the
Borok students of Umakanta Academy at Agartala.6 It
was at his inspiration that some Borok students
like Nilmani Debbarma (now a renowned doctor)
and Aghore Debbarma (later a prominent communist
leader), took the initiative for the formation
of the Janasiksha Samity. They contacted Hemanta
Debbarma of Durga Choudhury and discussed the
matter of forming an organistion for spreading
education among the natives. They agreed in the
matter of holding a meeting of all the Borok
students and youths at the residence of Hemanta
Debbarma. After making these preliminary
arrangements, Nilmani Debbarma and Aghore
Debbarma contacted other senior Borok students
specially Dasarath Debbbarma (Deb)
*
and Sudhanwa Debbarma who were at that time
college students outside the State. Dasarath
Debbarma, (a college student at Habiganj of
Sylhet) and Sudhanwa Debbarma, (a college
student at Srikali of Comilla) greeted the
decision. Thus on 27th December 1945 an
organization came up in the meeting of the Borok
students and youths held at the residence of
Hemanta Debbarma at Durga Choudhury near
Agartala. The organization was named 'Tripura
Janasiksha Samity'. Sudhanwa Debbarma was
elected President, Dasharath Deb Vice-President
and Hemanta Debbarma General Secretary of the
Samity. This movement was an attempt at
universal education of all the Borok indigenous
people, first of its kind in Indian sub-contiment.
It was
because of this movement that 400 schools came
up at different places of the State within a
year.7 It
had to its credfit an account of 488 primary
schools having been established in all8 and
getting 300 of them recognized and aided by the
princely State authority. The then Education
Minister of Tripura Princely State was Mr. D.A.
W. Brown at that time. However, the Janasiksha
Samity was shortlived. Because it ceased to
exist in 1948 when its chief architects had to
go underground to evade arrest as the Communist
Party to which they were inclined was banned by
the Government. Later, it aims and objectives
carried forward by the 'Tripura Rajya Mukti
Parishad' formed in 1948. In this regard,
Dasarath.
Deb's own statement is worth
mentioning that "though the open activity of the
Samity had to cease but the underground work
continued. The active and militant workers of
the Samity formed 'Rajya Gana Mukti Parishad'
and that organization at a later stage had been
named as 'Tripura Upajati Gana Mukti Parishad'.9
With a different
ideological approach, the 'Tripura Rajya Mukti
Parishad' launched autonomy movement in the
State. This Parishad was renamed 'Tripura Rajya
Gana Mukti Parishad' in 1951, and after the
split in the CPI, in 1964, the CPI (M) - led
organization was named 'Tripura Rajya Upajati
Gana Mukti Parishad' but in common parlance it
has been coming to be called GMP.
Coming back to
the period of transition of Tripura princely
State from monarchy to democracy, it is seen
that Prince Kirit Bikram Kishore Manikya
Debbarma was a minor and nearly 15 years at the
time of the death of his father King Bir Bikram
(17 May 1947 at 8:40 pm.). Then, Council of
Regency was formed to run the administration
under the Presidentship of Queen Kanchan Prabha
Devi, mother of Kirit Bikram, on 8th August
1947. Even before the Indian Independence, the
Regent Maharani could realize what a troublesome
situation was in store for her if India was
partitioned. Therefore, before partition she put
her claim over those areas, which were once
within the principality of Tripura's Maharaja in
order to maintain Tripura's bigger entity and
save it from isolation. So, as situation arose,
B.K. Debbarma, Chief Minister of the State, was
sent to Delhi to place the demand before the
Central authority. The Chief
Minister held parleys with the high dignitaries
including Sardar Patel.10 Maharajkumar
B.K. Debbarma was the Vice-President of the
Regency Council, Kumar Bankimbihari Debbarma was
a member and Satyabrata Mukhopadhyay was Prime
Minister of the Regency Council.
Within a few
months after the death of King Bir Bikram
Kishore Manikya Bahadur Debbarma, Tripura
princely State faced a great crisis and there
was a threat both from internal and external
forces. The President of the Council of Regency
was under severe pressure and had to opt to join
the Indian Union. In the meantime, the Queen on
the advice of the Government of India had to
dissolve the Council of Regency and became
herself as the sole Regent on 12th January 1948,
and after about more than a year she on behalf
of the minor Maharaja Kirit Bikram, had to sign
the Tripura Merger Agreement on 9th September
1949. Thereafter, the administration of the
Tipperah Kingdom became a part of Indian Union
from 15th October 1949 A.D. and later it was
administered by the Chief Commissioner, A.B.
Chatterjee, as a 'C' category State. Thus, the
death of King Bir Bikram was followed by a
period of political vacuum, chaos and confusion.
The situation was nearer to anarchy due to lack
of able leadership, communal riots in East
Bengal, influx of refugees, struggle for
succession, occupation of Kamalpur by the
Muslims, attempts at annexing Tripura with
Pakistan.11
After the
death of King Bir Bikram Kishore Manikya
Bahadur, Kanchan Prabha Devi, the Queen of
Tripura, was appointed as the President of
Regency Council and thus was
empowered to rule
Tripura. In real sense, the power of that
Regency Council was with the steward only, whom
the Government of India had appointed. In that
period of steward administration, barbarous
torturing and repression was started in the
hilly areas of Tripura from the administrative
side itself. The exploiters, the capitalists and
the Dewani Administration let loose brutal
repression in order to subdue that farmers
movement in Tripura. In 1949 the cows of
Golaghati had been suffering from some diseases.
The farmers became totally ruined as they lost
all their cows one by one. Many farmers could
not cultivate the land properly as they lost the
bulls for ploughing. There was an apprehension
of extreme food crisis. So, all the tribal and
non-tribal farmers of that area and other
non-tribal people, Hindus and Muslims objected
to carry the share of paddy to their money
lender, an ill reputed person named Hari Saha.
The farmers demanded to the money lender (known
as dadandar) to count this due share as a part
of their loan again. In the beginning, Hari
Saha, the money lender, agreed to count it as a
loan to the farmers, but in his mind he had some
evil design. The people of that locality could
not guess that evil design of that usurious
money lender behind the acceptance of their
proposal to give them paddy. Hari Saha, already
made a blueprint, contacted the police
administration of the then Congress Government
to punish the farmers. Putting faith on the
words of the money lender, all the poor people
went to collect paddy on a due date but they had
to face a merciless attack of the police. All of
a sudden, the police started to shoot these
unarmed people indiscriminately. On this attack,
6(six) tribal farmers along with 1(one) Bengali
Muslim farmer were shot dead by the police on
9th October 1949.12 Many
others were injured. An
ill-reputed sub-inspector of police named Mihir
Chowdhury led the massacre that took place in
the village called Bhaktathakur para in the area
of Golaghati. There raised a storm of protest
throughout whole Tripura against this barbarous
attack of the police on the farmers. There was
wide spread discontentment among the farmers,
especially among the tribal farmers and this
agitation was spread throughout whole Tripura.
In Golaghati itself, the Government had to
enforce an extensive torture to curb down the
first mass movement of the poor and the
exploited people.
It is in that
period only that the government started to
attack the leaders of Janashiksha Samiti. The
summons for arresting them was enforced again.
Even the schools were not exempted from this
attack. In many places, the teachers of those
schools were arrested. Due to this wide spread
tortures and repression by the police and army,
the expansion of education by the Janashiksha
Samiti was hampered. Under severe repression few
leaders of Janasiksha Samiti got united and
formed Tripura State Ganamukti Parisad. The
leaders took underground shelter and started to
direct the movement from there itself. People on
behalf of Ganamukti Parisad raised their voice:
the government must withdraw the warrant of
arrest upon the leaders of Ganamukti Parisad,
Legislative Assembly or a responsible government
has to be formed in Tripura, educational system
has to be expanded in Tripura and the people of
Tripura have to be provided with sufficient
facilities to improve their economic condition
and so on. When martial law was declared in
Tripura, especially in Khowai area, in that
period the torture of armies took its extreme
form in the tribal inhabited villages. Many vile
affairs such as tyranny on ordinary masses,
arresting everyone without
distinction of man or woman, burning houses,
looting properties and even burning school
houses were done with the help of Police and
Army. As the schools were burnt, many students
had to take shelter in the forests. Being unable
to bear these severe tortures, Ganamukti
Parishad was forced to start armed resistance
struggle for self-protection. It was not the
desire of Ganamukti Parisad to launch fight for
self-protection. They were forced to do so.
Everywhere they had to confront the tortures of
the Army. In 1949 brutal killing of women at
Padmabill took place. Three heroic women, named
Kumari Debbarma, Madhuti Debbarma and Rupashri
Debbarma sacrificed their lives confronting the
army.13 The
tortures of these police forces were in extreme
form in Khowai and Sadar sub-division areas.
In early 1952
an electoral college of 30 members was
constituted through election held in January
1952. The Electoral College elected one
representative to the Rajyasabha.14 The
Government of India took a positive stand and
the Parliament of India passed the Territorial
Council Act, 1956 (Act. 104 0f 1956) providing
for the setting up of the Tripura Territorial
Council (TTC) consisting of 30 members. Tripura
became a Union Territory without legislature
with effect from November 1, 1956.
The first
election to the TTC was held in Macrh 1957.
Sachindralal Singha became the Chairman of the
Council. The second election to the TTC was held
in February 1962. Sachindralal Singha again
became the Chairman of the Council. Union
Territories Act, 1963 provided for the
propmotion of the Territorial Council to the
status of a
Legislative Assembly. It came into effect from
1st July 1963. Sachindralal Singha was sworn in
as Chief Minister of Union Territoy of Tripura.
The first election to the Tripura Legislative
Assembly was held in February 1967.
Sachindralal Singha was again selected leader of
the Congress Party and thus he again became the
Chief Minister. On 21st January 1972 Tripura
attained the status of a full-fledged State. The
second election to the Tripura Legislative
Assembly was held in 1972. Sukhamay Sengupta
became the Chief Minister. The third election to
the Tripura Legislative Assembly was held on
31st December 1977. The Left Front captured 56
seats, while the TUJS got 4 seats; and the
Congress did not get even a single seat. Nripen
Chakrabarti became the Chief Minister of the
State. His 1978-82 Left Front Government was
predetermined to introduce a Bill in the
Assembly, seeking approval for the
establishement of Tripura Tribal Areas
Autonomous District Council (TTAADC).
Accordingly, the Bill was duly introduced soon,
and on 3rd Macrh 1979 the Assembly passed the
Bill. Out of about 10,478.78 sq. kms. the area
of TTAADC is about 7,132.56 sq. kms. In other
words, 68.10 percent of land has been brought
under the control of the TTAADC. The demand for
upgrading the TTAADC under Schedue VI of the
Indian Constitution never subsided. So, as the
refugees coming from erstwhile East Pakistan
(now Bangladesh) had been rehabilitated in the
State in different parts of Tripura, even in the
tribal reserve lands, outnumbering the natives
the communal hatred and tension slowly developed
in the minds of both the ethnic groups. This was
manifested in the worst communal riot broke out
in Tripura on Friday the 6th June 1980 between
the natives and the foreign nationals where
thousands of people belonging to both the
communities mercilessly lost their lives. The
tribal resentment took a violent
turn
and spread like a bonfire to ravage the Bengali
settlements. Thus at last the potential conflict
became actual.15
Another
important issue of the natives of the State is
the protection of their land. The Tripura Land
Revenue & Land Records Act, 1960 was a bold step
in protecting tribal interests in so far as
henceforth it prohibited all transfers of tribal
land anywhere in Tripura.16 Even
then, 'Benami' transfer and sale continued. This
time, a drastic step was taken. In 1973, by an
ordinace all illegal transfers after 01.01.1969
were declared void, admitted all transfers
between 1960 and 1968 and also revoked Maharaj
Bir Bikram's order for reservation. Reservation
of land for the natives (1950 sq. miles) was
made by the king for five tribal communities
(Puran Tripuri, Noatia, Jamatia, Riang and
Halam). Land related ethnic clash between the
two communities used to occur in different parts
of the State in the posr merger period
particularly in the 1960s and 1970s. For
instance, Bir Bikram Jamatia of Garing Kwkham
Kami of Khampar of Teliamura, West Tripura
District, became probably the first martyr in
the hand of some land hungry refugees on 10th
May 1973 when he faught for the restoration and
protection of tribal land in Tripura.
So, the demise
of King Bir Bikram, division of the country,
communal riots, influx of refugees, secessionist
movement, communist movement, Bangal Kheda
movement - all these happened simultaneously.
The State administration was on the verge of
collapse.17
In spite of a
feudalistic-colonial rule, Tripura faced no
major disturbance except the Reang Revolt of
1942-43, which was directed essentially against
the ruling monarch.18 Due
to direct influence of India's freedom movement
which began to penetrate the plains of Twipra /
Tipperah from the first half of the 20th
century, new socio-political movements soon
emerged. Eventually, there emerged a number of
socio-political organizations, which soon
demanded for the immediate democratization of
Twipra's political system and establishment of
responsible government. Most vocal among newly
formed political parties were the Tripura State
Congress and the Communist party. Yielding to
the public pressure, the Regent Queen, Maharani
Kanchanprabha Devi, on behalf of the minor
Maharaja Kirit Bikram Kishore Manikya Debbarma,
announced the decision of the State to be a part
of Indian Union on 9th September 1949, which was
ratified by the Tripura Sangha in an open
session attended by about 20,000 indigenous hill
people particularly the Boroks and all other
political organizations.
With the rise
of non-tribal population in Tripura, some
ethnocentric tribal organizations came into
existence in 1947 with a view to protecting the
tribal interest and organised various movements
for autonomy in the territory. After the deamise
of King Bir Bikram Kishore Manikya, his
step-brother Durjoy Kishore Debbarma formed 'Bir
Bikram Tripur Sangha'. Its main aim, besides
other mottoes of social reforms, was to resist
the influx of refugees into Tripura. It worked
heart and soul to safeguard the tenancy right of
the permanent inhabitants of Tripura.
Consequently, the Government of Tripura notified
in March 1949 that 'prayer for land settlement
of those who are not subjects of Tripura State
will not be
entertained without written
permission of the Dewan of the State.'19
The Sangha had its militant wing styled in
Kokborok as 'Sengkrak', which called for a
showdown of the natives against the Bengalee
refugees. This militant wing was also known for
its Bangal Kheda movement. Sengkrak was declared
outlawed and banned by A.B. Chatterjee, the then
Chief Commissioner of Tripura, for its vilolent
activities. After the Sengkrak was banned, the
'Paharia Union' came into being in July 1951
under the leadership of Chandra Sadhu Rupini.
Another organization, namely 'Adhivasi Samity'
was formed in 1952 under the leadership of
Sunutijivan Chakma and Madhab Master. There was
another political organization known as
'Adhivasi Sangha', which was formed in November
1953 at Agartala. In the interest of a stronger
tribal organization, all these organizations
were combined together so as to form a bigger
organization called 'Adhivasi Sangsad'.
The sengkrak
again appeared for the second time in 1967.
During this time it confined its activities
mainly in Dasa Kanchanpur areas of North Tripura
and launched movement with the blessing of the
Mizo National Front. In November 1967
wall-posters appeared in Kanchanpur area in the
name of Sengkrak directing the Bengalee refugees
to vacate Tripura.20
After the
partition (1947) of the Indian Sub-Continent and
subsequent Merger of Tripura with the Indian
Union, there had been continuous influx of
foreign nationals into the state particularly
the Hindu Bengali refugees from erstwhile East
Pakistan (now Bangladesh). Within a period of 24
years i.e.
15 August 1947 to 24 March 1971
the number of foreign nationals swelled to
6,09,998 officially.21 However,
it is claimed to be 7,30,017* persons
by some researchers and intellectuals on the
basis of authentic Government documents.
Besides, lakhs of migrants were not recorded.
There was no protective measure taken either by
State Govt. or the Centre to prevent the process
of continuous influx of immigrants into the
State. In fact, the process of influx of illegal
immigrants is still continuing and this is the
crux of the problem of Tripura, today. This
state of affairs has created various kinds of
problems not only for the natives but also for
those non-natives who were already in the State
prior to its merger with Indian Union. The Borok
people, the aborigines of Tripura, once absolute
majority having ruled their own ancestral land
for few thousands years continuously, have now
been marginalized and outnumbered and reduced to
31.05% (2001 Census) of the total population of
the State by the non-natives and illegal
immigrants from across the international
borders.
Although the process
of influx of the migrants began in the early
1940s, it was considered to be negligible. In
fact, large-scale influx of migrants took place
in the post-merger period (to be more specific
the period between 1950 and 1971) outnumbering
the indigenous population of the State. This
development of the demographic scenario of the
state had become a serious issue on the part of
the ethnic and cultural identity of the
indigenous people particularly the Boroks. It
was, they think, a 'threat to the very
existence' of the Borok
community. In other
words, becoming a minority in their own land
itself made the Boroks feel threatened at the
hands of the alien people.
Tripura has now
become a State whose indigenous peoples (Boroks)
have been transformed from being an absolutely
numerical majority and ruling community into a
minority with no economic and political
influence within a period of five decades of its
merger. This pathetic condition of the Boroks is
mainly due to the unprecedented influx of
foreign nationals and illegal immigrants into
Tripura from erstwhile East Pakistan, now
Bangladesh.
Most
significant in all these developments was the
gradual polarization of Borok ethnic and
cultural consciousness on the part of the Borok
community causing identity assertion. This
ethnic and cultural consciousness ultimately
resulted in the formation of the Tripura Upajati
Juba Samiti (TUJS) in June 1967. The Boroks felt
themselves deprived of their fundamental rights.
Convinced of the fact that the Congress and the
Communist party did not play effective role for
the protection and preservation of their
identity, interests and self-determination. So,
the TUJS in one of its slogans declared thus, "kwchak
kuphur chwng siniya, buini tola chwng tongya,
kwchak kuphur chwng hwnya, buini tola chwng
tongya" (we do not know what is Communist or
Congress, we will not stay under any one's
control, we do not any longer want to be under
the umbrella of the Communist party or the
Congress party). The party ideology of the TUJS,
among others, centered on: (i) popularization of
Kokborok (Borok language) as a symbol of Borok
community identity; (ii) education in Kokborok;
(iii) restoration of land, and (iv)
demand
for self-government.22 On
11th December 1968 some rural Bengalees, who
were worst sufferers, formed an association
called Amara Bangali. Quite contrarily, many
Bengali leftists working under the flag of CPI
(M) organized demonstrations, meetings and
strikes in favour of the tribal demands.
Accordingly,
in 1974 an official circular of the Government
of Tripura to all departments desiring
increasing use of the Bengali language in
official correspondence was immediately reacted
to by the TUJS and other Borok leaders. Their
chief demands were: (i) reinstatement of the
Princely order of reservation, (ii) reservation
of tribal lands transferred after the TLR and LR
Act, 1960, (iii) recognition of their language (Kokborok)
as one of the State languages and (iv)
recognition of the tribal villages under a
District Council. In 1974, a socio-cultural
organization named Barkhi Halam was formed which
stood for the preservation and promotion of
tribal traditions, culture, language and
history. Some Bengalees particularly those
living in the hills were unhappy at the decision
of the government23 to
introduce District Council for the Borok tribals.
By the middle of 1979, communal tensions were
running high. Consequently, in June 1980,
communal riots broke out between the two
communities, i.e. the Borok tribal community and
the Bengali community. This kind of ethnic riot
is always to be discouraged by all sections of
population for the greater interest of
development of human society. Rather, a peaceful
and constitutional way of dealing things is to
be encouraged by all for the restoration of
peace and harmony in the State.
Amidst tormenting chaos and confusion the first
election to the TTAADC was held on 3rd January
1982. The Left Front formed the Council. Sri
Aghore Debbarma was elected the Chief Executive
Member of the Council. The second election to
the TTAADC was held on 30th June 1985. The Left
Front again formed the Council. The enactment of
the TTAADC under Schedule VII of the
Constitution of India did not solve the tribal
problem. The demand for upgrading the TTAADC
under Schedule VI of the Indian Constitution
never subsided. So in July 1979, B.K. Hrangkhawl
and a few others organized a militant
association called Tripura National Volunteers (TNV)
with the ostensible aim of harbouring
centrifugal forces. The militants went on
committing atrocities one after another. So, on
2nd February 1987, TNV was outlawed. But having
cast off its sloughs, it emerged under the guise
of National Liberation Front of Twipra (NLFT) on
14th April 1989. Sudhir Ranjan Majumdar's
Congress-TUJS coalition (1988-93) came to power.
During this regime TUJS had played a
vital role to curb insurgency. The next Assembly
election was held in early March 1993, the Left
Front became victorious.24 Dasarath
Deb became the first and only Chief Minister of
Tripura among the natives. Dasarath Deb's
1993-97 Left Front Government and Mr. Manik
Sarkar's Left Front Governments in two terms
(1998-2002) and (2003-2007) have been, to some
extent, able to reduce the militants activities.
But till today the problems of the natives have
not been solved by the Government - State and
the Centre. The need of the hour is to find out
the crux of the unrest of the natives and solve
the problems constitutionally. Otherwise coming
days may be more detrimental to the civil
society of Tripura. |